Thomas Paines Common Sense Essay - 1149 Words

In the work of Thomas Paine, Common Sense Paine mentions throughout of the working for a positive government with the idea of equality. Thomas Paine writes different excerpt that give theories and idea with the goal of implementing those ideas into a government that may be just and fair. Paine reflects on the English constitution specifically the crown. Paine also provide an insight to having a higher power to run a government. Paine also criticizes the idea of monarchy and hereditary succession. Complications would ultimately arise through his ideas and theories due to the differences in religions. Thomas Paine expresses his feelings toward the English constitution and its flaws specifically the crown. According to Paine, because the†¦show more content†¦Ultimately Thomas Paine criticized the English constitution to the fullest extent and how it is flawed due to the power variations in government. In the previous paragraph, although Paine talked about the flaws that come in to play in a government that is run by a single ruler, he then talked about how having a ruler may be inevitable and provides an example of how it may work. Though Paine doesnt argue against having a ruler to the fullest extent due to the amount of oppressive that is seen through having single rulers, he feels that there should be someone in charge but have equal power with other parties, therefore that single person isnt in complete control. According to Paine, Let the assemblies be annual, with a President only. The representation more equal. Their business wholly domestic, and subject to the authority of a Continental Congress. This shows Paines thinking on producing a government with equality. In this example, there will be representation from all aspects and people, so they can and will be part of the decision-making as well as the President. Thomas Paines theory on creating a government with a higher power which is surrounded by equality can flourish due to the elimination of oppression, tyranny, and abuse of power. Thomas Paine criticizes the idea of monarchy and hereditary succession. MonarchyShow MoreRelatedThe Apology For Thomas Paines Common Sense749 Words   |  3 Pageswith a severe lack of common sense in the modern world is rapidly increasing. Without this common sense, the world turns into a mass of chaos and confusion. According to Merriam-Webster, common sense is defined by having sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts. Our world is in a grave and desperate drought of common sense, and the only way to quench this thirst is to reevaluate ourselves, our thoughts, and our practices. Common sense begins with respect forRead MoreAnalysis Of Thomas Paines Common Sense856 Words   |  4 PagesDuring the time period that Thomas Paine wrote â€Å"Common Sense†, the country was debating whether or not they should separate from their ruling country, Great Britain. Throughout this piece, Paine uses sev eral persuasive strategies including metaphor and pathos, in order to prove to his audience that they should separate from Britain. Paine uses both of these literary elements to prove that the country will, in fact, be successful if they separate, making it a successful propaganda tool. In his writingRead MoreAnalysis Of Thomas Paines Common Sense909 Words   |  4 PagesAfter reading section three of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, there are some counterpoints that can be presented against the idea of declaring independence from Britain and revolution. Many of the colonists are unhappy with how the British government was treating them and they had valid reasons to be unhappy, but the declaring independence from Britain would not be beneficial to the colonies and its people. In section three of Common Sense, Paine says â€Å"I challenge the warmest of advocate for reconciliationRead MoreThe Rhetorical Analysis Of Thomas Paines Common Sense828 Words   |  4 Pagesactivist Thomas Paine during the beginnings of the American Revolution wrote a pamphlet , Common Sense , to convince the American people and the continental congress to completely break away from England and its monarchy. Paine writes in a passionate tone to explain the differences between society and government, how they both form, and why. Paine aims to convince his audience to cut ties with the motherland through his use of rhetorical appeals, figurative language, and schemes. Thomas Paines passionateRead MoreThe Reasoning Of Loyalism In Thomas Paines Common Sense817 Words   |  4 Pagespamphlet, â€Å"Common Sense,† written by Thomas Paine to the current inhabitants of America, he addresses the flaws of the reasoning of the loyalists and persuasively shows the audience the right path. He does this effectively by appealing to the rhetoric form of logos, setting up each of his arguments with a parallel structure, and by using simple language that everyone can understand. One of the ways Paine argues against loyalists is by using strictly logic or what he calls â€Å"common sense.† He setsRead MoreEssay about The Effects of Thomas Paines Common Sense1635 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effects of Thomas Paines Common Sense How important was it for America to gain its independence from England? Thomas Paine, an English radicalist, thought that it was extremely important. Important enough to write a pamphlet on why American Colonist should have independence. At the time, 1776, many Americans felt the same way about Paines view on independence, but never took any action on it. Common Sense was published in 1776 as a way to engage people in certain political issues atRead MoreVersute Power In Thomas Paines Common Sense By Thomas Paine831 Words   |  4 Pageshave to get the population they are ruling to listen. Different leaders use different strategies to ensure the people follow the laws that they have established, some use force, beliefs, or even popularity to their advantage. In the book, Common Sense by Thomas Paine, we learn about how the British king used different types of tactics to get the people settling in the colonies of America to obey his commands. Even though the king eventually lost control of the American colonies entirely, the amountRead MoreThomas Paine, an American Philosopher1267 Words   |  6 PagesAn American born philosopher, Thomas Paine, was a strong adherent for independence and was agnostic in the government. Born on January 29, 1737, Paine lived what we would now call a tough life (http://www.britannica.com). At a young age, Paine had to withdraw from school to help his father with work. He attempted many jobs such as a hunting smuggler and a collector of tobacco and liquor taxes (http://www.britannica.com). Paine failed at those other jobs he tried and in 1774, moved to PhiladelphiaRead MorePolitical Contributions Of Thomas Paine1435 Words   |  6 Pagesthe most influential writers in history, Thomas Paine, a brutally candid writer with firm beliefs, was a well-liked and illustriously influential Patriot writer during the American Revolution. Nonetheless, after the revolution Paine published various books that, due his brutally honest tone an d chosen subjects, were controversial, unpopular, and or disregarded and criticized by conventional Americans. Consequently, leading historians to later disparage Paine’s contributions towards America. NeverthelessRead MoreThomas Paine Common Sense Analysis1052 Words   |  5 PagesThe birth of a nation does not happen overnight nor with one word. One can clearly see how words and ideas have an impact on people’s thoughts and writing by examining â€Å"The Declaration of Independence† and Thomas Paine’s â€Å"Common Sense.† Basically, the two documents echo principles stated in John Locke’s â€Å"Second Treatise of Government,† and share a style of expressing their feelings on national issues; the authors examine and give reasons for colonial problems with the government and offer a solution

Fahrenheit 451 Equilibrium - 945 Words

In many science fiction novels, the future is often dipicted with dystopian or totalitarian societies. In these societies theres dehumanization, an oppressive government, envrionmental disaters, or other attributes associated with a cataclysmic decline in society. In both of the selections Fahrenheit 451 and Equilibrium, the government suppresses the people and keeps them under control. Although the goverentment suppresses the society, the protagonist of each selection overcomes the oppression. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, the protangonist is a fireman, Guy Montag. He lives in a dystopian community set in future America. In this society, the firemen burns book because out of fear of what they may cause. Since books contain†¦show more content†¦Later they put in a call and so does Mildred. Montag has his home burned and his wife leaves him. He is enraged and kills Beatty with the flame thrower. Then he is on the run from the police because he has comitted murder and they are after. Montag flees to the countryside of the city and he find people like him. They read and understand books and have fleed after they rebelled against the government. Theres many like them around. Then an atomic bomb hits the city and nearly everyone is dead. Montag and his new frienda have survived and they plan on edjucated everyone who survived of what they know of books. In Equilibruim, Preston makes a plan with the Underground to kill the leader. He is moved by the goverment incarsinrating his wife a while ago, after she comitted feeling and woman whom his partner loved. He fights his way against the government. He defeats them all then kills the leader. He destoys all the video feed of Father speaking to the public and the Prozium manufacutring center. In these dystopian societies, the protagonists both overcame the opressing government. Montag knew something was wrong with socitey and that he had to make a change. Before the bomb hit Montags city, he was assigned to reme mber the book of Ecclesiastes. He and the other old reders would go around teaching and talking to people about the stuff they read and remember. They will soon talk with everyone and everyone will be better acceptingShow MoreRelatedDystopian Response To The Movie Equilibrium And Fahrenheit 451864 Words   |  4 PagesThe book Fahrenheit 451 and the movie Equilibrium have many similarities, but they also have many differences. Both Show this through the characteristics of a dystopia, the controls used, and how the main character acted. A dystopia is an imagined, unpleasant, futuristic place where society is controlled and seen to be perfect by the corrupted citizens. A dystopia is controlled through a corporate, bureaucratic, technological or philosophical control. Both of these stories are dystopian stories andRead MoreThemes of Mental, Emotional and Genealogical Equality in Fahrenheit 451932 Words   |  4 PagesGiver, the movie Equilibrium, or even Alan Moore’s V for Ven detta. These three examples give three completely altering views on human equality and likeness presented in different ways. In The Giver, it presents a world without color or choices: mental equality. In the movie Equilibrium, it ponders a world where people cannot feel: emotional equality. Lastly, in the graphic novel V for Vendetta, it reflects an England without racial diversity: genealogical equality. In Fahrenheit 451, all of the aboveRead MoreRay Bradbury s Fahrenheit 4512323 Words   |  10 PagesPicture a world where one must meet the expectations of being normal, where diversity is not accepted, or even worse, a detached society where emotions no longer exist. By reading the first few pages of Fahrenheit 451, readers immediately get the feeling of a dystopian society. Firemen creating fires, instead of extinguishing them, and technology that has taken their society to a whole new level of entertainment. These are exaggerated ideas right off the bat, yet Ray Bradbury carr ies the readersRead MoreTechnology And Its Effect On Society1694 Words   |  7 Pagesthan 5 minutes, spent their time inside playing video games or on their cellphones allowing technology to be the only thing they know and rely on to have fun or be informed. Moreover, this guides us to the points Ray Bradbury makes in his novel Fahrenheit 451. Bradbury touches on several points discussing a dystopia in which he advocated that technology will come to a point where it will take over humanity allowing for it to control all human beings sanctioning them to believe only what is beneficialRead MoreComparison Between 1984 And Fahrenheit 4511404 Words   |  6 PagesClose examination of the respective protagonists and antagonists of both 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury reveals how the texts in question challenge and restructure the outdated ‘myth’ of moral absolutism through characters which do not comfortably fit the mould of ‘hero’ or ‘villain’. With reference to these characters and evaluation of their morality in relation to three key branches of normative ethical theory – namely deontological ethics, virtue ethics and care ethics–Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesDirty Dozen 444 The Meaning of Empowerment 445 Historical Roots of Empowerment 446 Dimensions of Empowerment 447 Self-Efficacy 447 Self-Determination 448 Personal Consequence 449 Meaning 449 Trust 450 Review of Empowerment Dimensions 451 How to Develop Empowerment 451 Articulating a Clear Vision and Goals 452 Fostering Personal Mastery Experiences 453 Modeling 454 Providing Support 454 Emotional Arousal 455 Providing Information 456 Providing Resources 457 Connecting to Outcomes 457 Creating ConfidenceRead More_x000C_Formwork for Concrete Structures77423 Words   |  310 Pagesfor Shoring Concrete Formwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OSHA Regulations for Formwork and Shoring Conversion of Units of Measure between U.S. Customary System and Metric System ... 438 438 439 444 446 447 449 450 451 451 451 454 456 460 463 465 471 493 505 507 513 A B C D E ...... Directory of Organizations and Companies Related to Formwork for Concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Index ....................................... Preface T his book is

Chinese Kinship Systems Essay Example For Students

Chinese Kinship Systems Essay It would be impossible to disagree with the statement that Chinese kinship is based on male predominance. In fact this statement may even be under-emphasizing the control and absolute power that males wield across all levels of Chinese society. Of course, where their power initially comes from though, is through the family or termed differently the jia. It is this extended or ideal family that cultivates the consistent patrilineal form of control/descent and dictates that residence in said jia is primarily patrilocal. That being said, what I hope to be able to create over the following pages is a clearer understanding of the ideal (Chinese) system of control. This ideal system,based on the ideal of male predominance, is outlined impeccably in the writings of Baker, Watson and Xiaotong. There are also excellent examples of an ideal jia and its power structure in Wolfs ethnography, The House of Lim. But Wolfs ethnography also outlines examples whereby the ideal system of dominance is n ot always put into practice or is just not as smooth running as the writings of the 3 former anthropologists would have you believe. It is my aim then, to include examples of a patriarchal system encountering problems and realities that are difficult to explain in an ideal sense.There is little doubt, according to Baker, that the first and foremost aspect to understanding Chinese families and society at large is the importance placed on male relationships and descent that is traced through a male line. In contrast, women in Chinese society were given little thought and even less power. They were to be used as reproducers of the male line and to aid in home/farm labour, apart from this; women had only small amounts of power and responsibility. In fact, the patriarchal system demanded that a wifes only connection with her husbands family be through the husband himself. Her future then, was caught up with his and her sons only, and she is expected to see her husbands interests as param ount in importance (Baker, 1979).Yet, women and childbirth, were essential to the continuation of the patrilineal system, which started with the birth of a son or sons to any kinship system be they peasant or gentry class. It was considered vitally important in Chinese society, that a wife bare a son as soon as possible not only for the continuity of descent (Baker, 1979), but also for her own well being and position in her own family. I will return to this point later, but before going anywhere further it is best to ask why a son was so important in the first place? There is, of course, a myriad of strong reasons, one reason being that surnames were passed down through the male line. This process meant that a male child was needed to take the surname of their father not their mother. Meaning that surname in China was integral to creating a kinship system, which placed heavy emphasis on male superiority. It was through this handed-down surname, that the massive kinship systems such as a lineage or a clan could be generated and held together over generations and generations. Hereditary surnames were also the primary form of hierarchical family organization, and were inherently needed to practice ancestor worship. This type of worship, through a patrilineal method, was exercised even after kinship members had long since been deceased. The handing of the surname to a fathers son (s), then meant that he now existed to continue not only his present family but the extended family that came before him, and the jia that would surface in the future. Bakers use of a rope metaphor works well here, depicting a rope (standing for male heirs and descendents) which stretches back into the past and forward into the future. The rope at any one time may be thicker or thinner according to the number of strands (jia) or fibers (male individuals) which exist, but so long as one fiber remains the rope is there.That is the individual alive is the personification of all his forebears and all of his descendents yet unborn (Baker, 1979). Surname, then, depicted who you were, who you had control over and who you needed to respect and worship.Another major reason why a male child was so important in the Chinese kinship system, was the fact that inheritance followed the male line of descent. While it is interesting that Chinese kinship rules dictated that homogeniture be practiced, it was not as interesting that they followed the rule of inheritance through the male line of descent (I should clarify myself when I say not interesting, I mean it only in the sense of comparing China to other parts of the world where patrilineal inheritance was exceedingly common, yet the same places usually followed the rules of primogeniture not homogeniture). Inheritance usually involved the equal division of the family estate among brothers, which ideally occurred at the death of the household head or at a time agreed upon by all the senior kinship members. In contrast, while sons i nherited equal amounts of the estate, daughters usually inherited no farmland, property or any tangible/collateral goods at all. This was the case even though during childhood both sons and daughters were looked after by their parents, and both adopt the fathers surname (at least for their childhood, and possibly for young adolescence as well) (Xiaotong, 1983).Yet, by the time they reach adulthood and marriage is upon them, the son will continue to reside in the fathers home, while the daughter will be shipped out of her own jia and into the home of her arranged husband. This process of shipping out daughters is highly beneficial to the Chinese patriarchal system, in so much as the daughters must willingly take her new husbands surname as her own. Thereby becoming a part of his family and losing all ties to her own. Once this surname change has been completed, the daughters had no legal right to receive an inheritance that equaled or even resembled their brothers and as already ment ioned above, were not recognized shareholders in the family property (Watson, 1991). Ideally then, property is inherited by the son (s) whose obligation it is to support the parents when they reach old age. And by the third generation only the children of the son (s) carry on a continuous line of affiliation. The children of the daughter(s) in contrast, assume their own fathers surname and in turn become but distant relatives (Baker, 1979). In essence, this form of male dominance or patrilineal descent was utilized to the near exclusion of other ties, and as Watson puts it, this had of course a profound consequence not only on womens property rights but also on their ability to perform as the social equal of their brothers and husbands (Watson, 1991).It should be clear (or at least clearer) by now, that what is essential for the smooth running of a Chinese family is the existence of males, and more importantly the birth of males to a specific family. This in turn means that a union between a husband and wife must be formulated. It has been said earlier that most of these marriages were pre-arranged, usually before the son or daughter reached their teenage years. One important aspect of these unions is the fact that most newly wed couples continue to reside patrilocally. The newly inherited daughter-in-law comes to reside permanently with her husbands family, which is usually headed by a senior agnate or more specifically her husbands father (Baker, 1979). Sadly the majority of Chinese brides enter their husbands families and communities as hardly anything more than strangers. Which means that they have no social ties, nor economic ones to the new household they are forced to join. Due to patrilocal tradition, the newly created daughter-in-law must fend for herself and must establish herself in circumstances that may be far from welcoming (Watson, 1991). And because of the patriarchal systems that are in place in Chinese society, parents then before an arranged marriage can take place, already know that they can only rely on their sons for support, never their daughters. They know this will happen from day one of their daughters birth, no matter what happens she will leave the natal family and belong at some point to a separate non-natal family. It can therefore be possible to see just how important sons really are for the natal parents continued survival.For brides in China then, marriage means a change of address. In contrast though, most grooms continue to reside in the same communities that they were born into. This male-dominated system, as outlined by Watson, continues to create an environment in which there is a significant advantage for sons over and above daughters. Parents, Watson continues, realize that the skills of local daughters will be lost to the environment when daughters marry. In sum, patrilocal residence means that women do not experience the emotional, economic or status continuity that is enjoyed by their brothers a nd husbands (Watson, 1991).Interestingly, or perhaps ironically, is the fact that for women to improve their patrilocal position in their family, they must give birth to a male child as soon as possible. Before the birth of a male child, in an ideal Chinese family, husband and wife would not sit close to each other and would seldom be overheard talking to one another. Social stigmatization was apparent and readily enforced due to the supposed barrenness of the chosen wifes womb. With the birth of a son, a wifes position in the family was definitely strengthened. It is strange though by western traditions, to look at the absolute power such a young male child can have over an adult woman. For instance, the curtain of silence can now be raised and the child can signal the bonafide admittance of this woman into the family (Baker, 1979). The reasons, according to Xiaotong, that it is so important for the wife to have a male child is two-fold: 1) It ensures, in the first place, the conti nuity of the line of descent; and 2) it is a concrete expression of filial piety by the future father towards his ancestors. Everything prior to this has been based on the ideal or traditional system of kinship regulations. By no means is it an exhaustive look at the ideal rules outlining patrilineal dominance or patrilocal residence. What it instead creates is an image that Chinese society means to mimic. Of course there are times in reality where it is next to impossible to completely mimic or mirror the ways of an ideal society. What in turn is created, in society, can be termed a patrilineal modification. Some examples of this type of modification can be found in The House of Lim, which I will turn to shortly. But first I would like to include a patrilineal anomaly that occurs outside of traditional society. This anomaly deals with the possibility of a family conceiving no sons and instead conceiving only daughters. When this happens (though rare) a modification to the existing system must transpire. What happens is that said family, brings in an adopted son-in-law from outside of the integral kinship group. Once an agreement has been struck between the affinal and non-affinal parties, then the adopted husband will come and live in his wifes house with his wifes parents. Any children that are born into this union will assume the daughters parents surname, not his own (Xiaotong, 1983). This example is raised, because in and of itself, it contradicts what has been outlined before as a strict and claustrophobic patrilineal system. What this and examples from The House of Lim will show is the flexibility and variability that is also inherent to any kinship system.The Lim family in many respects in Taiwanese society, is both typical and at times atypical of the normal kinship forms found in the majority of Taiwanese homes (Wolf, 1968). Much of the atypical reasons, center around the size and inherent complexity of the Lims abode. Margery Wolf is quick to point out that the Lims household is comprised of fourteen permanent members and still manages to be the only family retaining the eminence of being, united under one roof. Ironically this situation is actually the ideal situation sought after throughout Taiwan and China. It is the aspiration of most families, to one day be able to house separate male dominated descent lines under one roof and under one headsman. What is common in reality though, is the occurrence of friction between brothers, especially married brothers living together in close quarters. No matter how strong the ancestral father or mother, the normal course of action is for the brothers to begin to squabble over power and domination of the family. And even though in a strictly traditional sense, the younger brother(s) should give in without a fight, this rarely happens in reality. The younger brother is meant to stay submissive, says Baker, and as long as the father is alive and the younger brother stays single, it is po ssible. Yet in most families, once the younger brother gets married the struggle for dominance escalates, with the only resolution the division of the family home and wealth (Baker, 1979). Wolf mentions this in her ethnography and goes on to say, occasionally a large family for a time escapes this fate. The Lim family was such a one. The potential new families were not realized. Lim Chieng-cua together with his wife and children remained along with his older brothers widow and descendents in an undivided family. This situation is what makes the Lims so unique. Their household becomes the ideal, or if you will, the prototypical stereotype of a perfect patrilineal family, where power and control is channeled through a single male head (Lim Chieng-cua). DRESS CODES Essay How was it possible then, that such an ideal structure was created in the Lim family, while other families succumbed to the usual separation? Many reasons are subtlety outlined in Wolfs ethnography, but two unique ones stand out above the rest. The first stems directly from Lim Han-cis strong character and personality. He was a true patriarchal head, a father who was exceedingly active in training and controlling his family (Wolf, 1968). Lim Han-ci generated for his family a reputation and a name, which survived his ultimate death. Though at times brutal, Lim Han-ci became a symbol to the Lim family, outlining what the family needed to strive for in succeeding generations. In fact, all fourteen members of the family protected the honor that Lim Han-ci created, as if he was still present and walking among them. It is through this type of patrilineal respect that Lim Chieng-cua was able to maintain such a high degree of control (Wolf, 1968). This of course, was not the only reason that power became vested in the hands of Lim Chieng-cua. Another focal point that transferred power to the third eldest was the death of Lim Hue-lieng. Without the events surrounding Lim Hue-lieng, it seems less likely that the Lim family would have maintained such close ties. His death strengthened Lim Chieng-cuas position immensely, because as mentioned above, there was now only one brother. And one brother meant that there should be no squabble over inheritance and more importantly no division of kinship power. Yet, if Lim Hue-lieng had still been living with the Lim family when he became terminally ill, his effect on the power situation might have been altered. What I am referring to, is Lim Hue-liengs past ventures into Taiwanese society, which caused a gap in the family, whereby patrilineal power shifted to the 3rd eldest son. Patrilineally speaking, Lim Hue-lieng should have inherited control over the family, or at least commandeered more power for his wife and sons. But this did not materialize due to his revolt at nineteen, against his family and more directly against his father (Wolf, 1968). His decision to join the lo mua was an act of extreme moral violence (Wolf, 1968). Such an act was reprehensible in such a patriarchal society, because a sons first duty was to obey, respect and support his father without question. In response to this action, a proud man like Lim Han-ci had no choice but to rethink the normal kinship structure. If his family was to survive, he had to ensure that a strong family head could be found. With his remaining time, a modification to the patrilineal system occurred in that all power and knowledge should now flow to Lim Chieng-cua.It is just this type of flexibility, on a situation to situation basis that caused the Lim family to remain united under one roof for so long. Sadly though, they could not maintain their unification indefinitely. Why not? It seems according to Baker and Xiaotong, that patrilineal power should have kept Lim Chieng-cua in charge until his death, but it did not. The patrilineal modification may then, have only delayed the inevitable. The inevitable being that Lim Hue-liengs first family (residing in the Lim household) eventually decided that Lim Chieng-cua was treating them with undue negativity and disrespect. The main culprit of the division, Lim A-pou, to her credit did not start to voice her displeasure with the situation until after her foster fathers death and the death of her husband. She believed (and probably rightly so) that because of her marriage to the eldest son, she would have some control over her own future particularly as the elder generations began to turn over their priority (Wolf, 1968). This position though, was compromised by the death of Lim Hue-lieng, and while Lim A-pou was still being consulted by the head of the family at this point. She was probably not given the amount of respect warranted to her position. From that moment forward, jealousy probably played an integral part in her quiet campaign for division (Wolf, 1968). And as arguments between Lim Chieng-cua became more frequent, she began to ur ge Lim A-bok _her eldest son) to also be less compliant in his dealings with his uncle (Wolf 1968). Ideally this should not have been allowed, but according to Wolf,Lim Chieng-cua was not the father. He was only the eldest male of the family and was a second son at that. The widow of the eldest son (Lim A-pou)- the son who under ordinary circumstances would be in Chieng-cuas position -is still alive and now has a son (Lim A-bok) who is contributing a full share to the family budget. Undoubtedly this ambiguity in structure of the family influences the attitudes of Lim A-pou and her son.This ambiguity was the eventual death of the united Lim family. Walls were mounted, positions dissolved and property/wealth were divided up as equally as possible. It was not though, the death of the patrilineal system. Patrilocal residence would continue for all of the Lim (future) families, ancestral worship would also continue and male dominance and gender inequality would still reign supreme. In fa ct very little underneath the surface or socially would change at all, the family would remain a residential and economic unit composed primarily of males. And in order to reproduce itself it would still be forced to import women as brides, and dispose of females born into it by marrying them off to other families. Finally, it would continue to lay heavy stress on relationships through males, and tended to play down those through females, while there was an accompanying stress on the importance of men as opposed to women (Baker, 1979).

The Zoos Are Really Very Cruel to Wild Animals free essay sample

All I can say is that through my opinion zoos are really very cruel to wild animals. Why is this so ? Well because they don’t think of the wild animals habitat and the liberty which they need. The shock of being in captivity would actually depress the animals; they would even act violently and might hurt people near them. And it is not the animal to be fault. Firstly, the ecosystem became unbalanced. Secondly If the humans kept the wild animals in the zoo, they will ruin their food chain. Animals need to run a lot, but their kept in the zoo where it is lack of spacious area. They need to hunt for their own food, however while in the zoo the foods are provided. There is no freedom for the animals for being kept by humans. Worst case possible is animals would get depressed and attack people randomly. We will write a custom essay sample on The Zoos Are Really Very Cruel to Wild Animals or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page People should not blame the animals if they got attacked; it is their own fault for keeping the animals in cages. Animals can die prematurely in zoos. For eg. In 1991 twenty-five Asiatic Lions were born in zoos around the world 22 of them died. In the same year 166 cheetahs were born in zoos, of which 112 died. And the last but the most important is that the animals are born naturally in the wild and us humans cannot provide them what nature gives for their needs. This is the crucial motive where animals should be freed   Or they should put them in sanctuaries instead and ask people to do animal safaris if they wanted to see the animals . at least the animals will get their freedom and live in peace.